Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Fertilisers are looking very exciting

The fertiliser market is getting hot. I awoke to the expectation that Union Resources was going to break above 1c today, and that looks sure to happen after BHP announced in today's paper that it was taking over potash miner POTASH CORP in a $39 billion takeover. That of course is going to sporn a grab for fertiliser assets around the world, and in this respect Minemakers Ltd (ASX:MAK) and Union Resources (ASX:UCL) are both minnows holding a world-class asset - a low cost phosphate resource in offshore Namibia. They will both be swept up in no time at all. We might even expect a bidding war.
See the latest news here:
Let's not forget that Union Resources also controls the latest undeveloped lead-zinc resource in its prtfolio, even though that resource is in Iran. Of course lead-zinc does not really fit with the group anymore, but they have some compatible interests like Cannington silver mine in Qld. I think they still have that. At the end of the day, they are about world-class, dry bulk materials.

A word of caution though. Rio Tinto and BHP are going to attract the attention of China, and the EU is often sympathetic to China's, if not its own farmers complaints about Anglo-world domination. The EU is not going to be happy with BHP taking over another industry. Expect some opposition to this development. Geez, its great times to be a mining analyst/investor.

We must remember that BHP is making a bid for a potash company, and UCL is phosphate. They are nevertheless compatible and complementary interests.
----------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Do the Chinese have to worry?

We support the Australian mining industry in its campaign to abolish the Resource Rent Tax.
See this election statement from Fortescue Metals. Fortescue Metals is of course leading the campaign against Labor and its Resource Rent Tax.
I personally think the issue is even more serious that Fortescue realises. The Chinese need commodities and Australia government, which professes to be a 'free trader' is kind of using tax to extort wealth from not just Australians, but really from the Chinese as well. Its not just Australia either. India has raises its tax on iron ore exports, which are destined for China. They are now consumed domestically, which means Australia has year had to buy even more iron ore from Australia and Brazil.
Such 'hard ball' tactics believe is destined to lead to an escalation in trade conflicts. This is a big issue for China. It reminds me of the trade embargoes placed on Japan which resulted in Japan joining the Germans in World War II. Ok, I don't expect a war, but one might question yet again the fairness of such 'non-market' extortion.
Notwithstanding the fact that China has its ideological conflicts, don't we want to lead them to market. Here, Labor seems to be telling them 'Screw you, we have the power now'. Its not market power, its market extortion. In this case some investors are able to pass on the costs.
--------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Union Resources (UCL.ASX) - making a move

A few weeks ago we bought Union Resources (UCL.ASX) at 0.5c and today they have not disappointed, up 60% this morning. They peaked at 0.8c this morning, and appear certain to test 0.9c by the close of the day. I actually expect this stock to break resistance at 0.9c, and move higher later in the week. Here is why.
We mentioned in our last post on Union Resources that the company has a JV with Minemakers in an offshore Namibian phosphate project. We would not be surprised to see Minemakers make a move on their JV partner because:
1. They have $34mil in cash, Union Resources have little
2. They have a dog phosphate project in Qld, and really need this Namibian project
3. Minemakers has just listed in Canada, so they seem to be attracting a lot of interest because of that.

Personally, I think there is a bit of manipulation going on prior to a takeover of Union Resources.
Of course, you don't need to listen to me, look at the stock. I'm not buying any....I got mine at 0.5c. This JV is going to be consolidated. I wouldn't be surprised if we see a move on Minemakers as well. Perhaps a likely candidate is Incitec Pivot. The fertiliser business is ripe for consolidation, as its already tightly controlled....but night tight enough to gain market power. Those pesky Moroccans have no idea about how to extort high prices from the market. Someone is going to come in and 'do a Rio-tro'. You can watch the price action at Google Finance.
Minemakers australian project is 1200km from the coast by rail, the Namibian project (MAK/UCL partnership) is on the coast. Its unconsolidated sands, using the same dredging technology to extract the phosphates that diamond mining uses. You can even lease the equipment. The large resource will justify a large plant on the coast. A major investor is likely. Where is the World Bank when you need them? Well last time I looked they were in the Far East of Russia.....helping Aricom raise $700mil.

When one thinks of Russia one is inclined to think of bad infrastructure, isolation and cold climates. The reality however is that parts of Russia are surprisingly close to China. What has caught my attention is the development of iron ore resources in the Far East of Russia by AIM-listed Aricom or ‘Anglo-Russian Industrial COMmodities’ [AIM:TIO]. It was spun off a Russian gold producer and explorer Peter Hambro Mining [AIM:POG] in Dec-2003. At the time it had one major asset, a 74% share in the Kuranakh ilmenite and titanomagnetite deposit, and a remit to acquire, develop and operate non-precious metal assets in Russia. Today however it controls 4 major deposits:[i]

Being an analyst/researcher, one is inclined to explore...go off on tangents if you like. In the process of researching about another one of my favourite stocks, I came across this company, Aricom. Relax, the stock is probably fully priced now...let's move onto bigger and better things. My point is that such projects really can take off. You just need to identify them.
Interestingly, Aricom is developing a titanomagnetite resource in the Far East of Russia to supply the northern Chinese steel mills. The Rio trio has got the Chinese throwing money at everything....but we cannot forget that there are other countries in the world which need steel. Everyone is so 'China' focused.
This is why I like MGK....because it is a company with another world-class resource just waiting for an integrated strategy to take it forward. The Chinese know now they cannot trust the Australian government to change the rules, so they will be looking outside Australia to diversify. Thanks Gillard/Rudd! Anyway, it suits me. I just hate to see a good country keep down. More importantly there is nothing more dangerous than politicians with no money sense throwing your money around. Just think - politicians with no financial literacy throwing 28% of GDP around with bogus accountability. They wouldn't allow it to happen in the funds management industry....well ok, I guess they do....but they do pretend to regulate....but they don't even accept that they should be held to a higher standard.

[i] Aricom’s iron ore projects, International Finance Corp, website, 27th May 2008.

--------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Market regulation sux - ASIC top of the list

It comes as no surprise that the Managing Director of A1 Minerals has resigned. This company is going backwards at the moment. It has broken its 15c support, and is now down to 12c support. There will be questions about why. I think it is the same reason as usual - the same problem which befalls many small gold stocks....nuggetty gold and the mining executives who trade these projects knowing full well their issues. Its amazing how a bad project can be turned into a 'diamond' with a bit of creative accounting. All this goes unregulated by ASIC because it has no skills. Mindless, rule-ridden bureaucrats who think they have an education because they went to university...and studied arts no less.
The problem of course is specifically with vein and shear-zone style gold deposits. Perhaps others as well, but I think you can have a lot of confidence in porphyry-copper/gold/Mo style gold deposits because the mineralisation is so pervasively spread throughout micro-veinlets in the rock.
This problem is huge in the mining industry. Of course is does not help that many mining executive have a dubious ethic, that the government does not regulate, that we are in a mining boom, and that people are regulated by so many silly rules, they might repute all rules as nonsense. Shareholders have a right to effective disclosure....they are not getting it, particularly at the small-end of the market, which is like the wild west.
For those who bought at 15c support, there is the prospect that AAM will go out of business. It is hard to believe that there is no gold, but the grade might be 1.5g/t rather than 4g/t. Who can say whether its a 'nuggetty' effect, or whether its manipulation of data with geostatistical modelling. Maybe it was just financial mismanagement. There are people in the industry who say nothing. It is all a 'game of friends' in WA.
I'm been to conferences where people will tell you that 'so and so' company's project has no credibility. The reason being they know people who have taken a look at it, and rebuffed it, whilst the opportunists 'mine the market' for money.
The industry is full of rationalisation and there is no critical insights coming to the market from people who know to stop this practice. As an analyst who can only go on reports (because I don't perform site visits or hang out in WA pubs), what can you do but draw attention to the issue. ASIC has to change the way it regulates. People will lose confidence in smaller stocks, which means there will be no new companies being formed in Australia, and investment will go offshore. Gillard's tax is just one issue.
I am recommending stocks which are undervalued...not because they are good...but because disclosure is so bad you cannot know the difference. I think there needs to be a role for analysts in managing the disclosure of these countries. I suggest the way to manage this issue is for the ASIC to pay a market analyst $5000 a year to prepare quarterly analytical reports on specific stocks. Based on critiquing of his work, responsibility might pass to another analyst. This approach would see some analysts dominate certain industries, it would force others to critique them to improve the reputation of their brokerage, and investors would have informed debate and analysis from brokers and the companies.
At the moment we have brokers collecting fees from shareholders/companies. The worse the company the higher the fee. I am reminded of Australian Magnesium Corp. I was working for a broker at the time. My analysis showed it was a dog, and the major brokers supported it because they wanted the 'very attractive' 7% commission offered by the company. It went broke.
Brokers are often corrupt too I think. There was suspicious activities at the broker I worked for. The MD of the company employed a hooker from the 'men's club' across the road as a secretary. I think it was because you can trust a hooker to keep secrets. Daily he would need to explain to her how to use excel and word, yet she was paid as much as me (an analyst). Go figure! Her boyfriend was also a broker.
Brokers are salesmen, they are not people with integrity. So long as this country, any country, is regulated by government agencies, you will get no justice, no accountability, which means people being rewarded for deceit. Compulsory super? Don't give up control of your money.
Sorry to those who lost money from my information. I'm in the same boat. Get angry. I think you are wasting your time complaining to your local MP. I would be inclined to vote for smaller government, i.e. LIbertarian based Liberal Democratic Party....not because they are people of integrity, but because there would some competition in the short term. I would also talk to your friends, and get them mad. Organise like business and unions have done before you. Make ideas count for something. There are too many self-serving dikks in the world.
The JORC code was supposed to restore credibility to the international mining industry. It has failed to do that with respect to gold reserves. It is probably adequate for other metals.
-------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Monday, August 02, 2010

AAM - good buying at 15.5c

Anyone want to enter AAM.ASX. Once again they are back at that 15c support level. There is 1mil buying at 15c, so you might have to go 15.5c to buy some. I hope there is an underwriter because the issue is at 18c, which makes it hard to have an issue if there are no buyers. I suspect there must be some institution prepared to carry the stock given the solid prices for gold.
As we speak you can buy them for 15.5c. :)
Apparently the reason for the fall is the loss of confidence arising from the extension of the closure date for the issue. Another bumbling mistake by the MD of the company. I guess one invests in the hope that he will be replaced. Must be a lot of upside if he is. He went into the market without an underwriter.
--------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com