Saturday, September 25, 2010

Rare earth elements (REEs) - what's the excitement

If you listen to the rhetoric (for example these articles one and two), you could be forgiven for thinking that the world is confronting a shortage of these 'rare' earth elements. You might have thought that any element with 'rare' for a name, must be 'rare'. On the contrary, some of them are not rare at all, and more importantly, they are quite expensive to recover. The reality is that there geochemistry is often unique, and judging from the Mt Weld and Greenland rare earth deposits, they have a long development lead time. I first discovered Lynas Corp 10 years ago. I rushed over to Perth to meet the MD, which was then the current MD of Marengo Mining, Les Emery. I made a lot of money to be sure, but to what end? It will be a project until next year, when it starts production.
The attention has been drawn to rare earths because they were rarely used in industrial applications, but today there is a lot of interest in them. The reality however is that offtake will be limited until there is more supply, and supply is coming. Not simply from Mt Weld, but also from deposits in Africa, Australia, Canada, USA, Greenland and Russia.
There is a huge REE resource in Greenland, which has significant concentrations of zinc and uranium. This project, if it can overcome the obstacle of its 'uranium' content, will supply 40,000 tonnes of REEs a year. Its a $1.5 billion development, dwarfing the Mt Weld project. I suggest the strategic reasons and the importance of the project will justify development for this small, newly self-governed Dannish territory. This project is scheduled to start production in 2015/16. That is some time off, but consider all the other sources. The Dubbo zirconia-rare earth-tantalum-yttria deposit is another huge resource. It has a 100 year supply of material.
Now, the fact that China is restricting supply in the short term is interesting. Might I suggest this has nothing to do with Japan. China loves embarrassing Japan. Its all about money. Some officials in China I suggest see some opportunity to make some money in the West buying up stock in some emerging rare earth producers. My guess they will be looking at Lynas Corp. This is a more common scam than you think. Remember, China controls 95% of the world's current production. Certainly it should take advantage of that opportunity to extort value from industry. The reality is that it will simply defer the increase in consumption of these metals, and probably spark greater research into alternatives. In the meantime of course, some executives around the world are going to make some money. This could be an exit strategy for some investors.
If you want to know more about the rare earth industry, I can suggest several sources of information:
1. Government agencies like US Geological Survey and Minerals UK
2. Corporate presentations and quarterly announcements to stock exchanges - look at Alkane Exploration, Greenland Minerals & Energy, Lynas Corp, Global Metals & Mining.

When you reflect on the long development lead time for these projects, the costly process flow sheet, you tend to get the impression that this industry is not as promising as some others with more proven processes. Who wants to compete with the Chinese anyway, they are fickle, government-sponsored enterprises, with the lowest conversion costs in the world. The fact that there are several projects around with cross-subsidised metal supply capacities makes me think that large inventories in these metals could accumulate. Given the small size of this market, I think I would be more inclined to invest in this sector after production is established and prices are subdued. They will make great counter-cyclical investments.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Canadian rare earths explorer in the former Soviet Union

For some time Canadians have been emailing me to undertake some research on Canadian specs which are worth investing in. I'm simply too overwhelmed to do so, however Kidela Capital Group approached me, asking if I would take a submission from them. Having looked at their story, I can see potential, so I freely offer a presentation they have prepared.
The following company, Stans Energy (CVE.RUU) is developing a rare earth deposit in the former Soviet Union. The company intends to use drilling and geophysics to identify extensions and satellite deposits to the existing mine, which hosts 5% lead and an association of light and heavy rare earth elements (REEs). These elements vary considerably in their value from cheap to very high value. They have a combination of both. Prior metallurgical recoveries were only 65%, so perhaps there is some scope for reprocessing old dumps.
See Google Finance for the latest stock price. Looking at the company's stock chart, it has broken technical resistance, so its probably going to consolidate on that previous resistance before moving higher. If you are interested in rare earths, you might want to read up on my previous postings about Lynas Corp (ASX.LYC) and rare earths, as these rare metals will eventually be very valuable. Why? Because in case of a shortage, prices will shoot because they are used in minute quantities in a diverse range of specialised high value applications.
I think its an interesting opportunity, however more research is required. One would need to assess how much ore is left. I think they have a 35Mt non-JORC compliant Russian estimate, but they will need to assess the validity of this resource estimate by reconciling with their own sampling. They will also need to perform a lot of metallurgical testwork to improve recoveries as 65% recovery strikes me as low, if the ore is only worth $50/tonne. I have not looked into this, and I will have a dialogue with the company.

50% Heavy Rare Earth Elements at Stans Energy’s Kutessay II from Stans Energy on Vimeo.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Marengo Mining (ASX:MGO) - provides a 2nd entry

Marengo Mining (MGO.ASX) technically provides another entry point. The price action has now moved ahead of the Moving Average, and we are seeing more support in the stock as a result. The latest price action is at 13.5c. We actually bought back in at 12.5c based on the technical resistance on 29th April 2010. As we know, resistance on the upside often becomes support on the downside.
For this reason, we are looking for another uptrend, knowing that there is a lot of value to be recognised in this stock. See Google Finance chart.
------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Be wary of carbon tax proposals

It appears that the CEO of BHP-Billiton Marius Kloppers is supporting the carbon tax. This ought to be reason enough to avoid certain stocks in Australia, or even foreign resources owned by Australian companies for the foreseeable future. The stocks I am talking about are:
1. Coal
2. Cement
3. Aluminium smelting
4. Coal seam methane
5. Power generation
6. Other energy intensive industries
See the following articles - one and two.
-----------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

My trading summary - Sept 2010

I have been actively trading today whilst simultaneously writing a critique about religion. You'd think that under those circumstances I'd be losing money, but actually things are working out surprisingly well, despite the market weakness. Some of the stocks in play at the moment:
1. Union Resources (UCL.ASX): We first bought this stock about a month ago at 0.5c, sold between 1-1.2c, only to buy back at 0.8c. The simple moving average has just turned and technical support is returning at 0.8c today, with a 2mil unit buyer. I expect this stock to move up further. This company will ultimately be taken over by Minemakers I believe, and perhaps at the same time, or later, Minemakers (MAK.ASX) will be taken over itself by one of the larger industry players like BHP, if they decide to pursue Potash Corp. UCL & MAK have a JV to develop the Sandpiper(?) phosphate deposit in offshore Namibia. Its 1-2 billion tonne resource.
2. Vital Metals (VML.ASX) has recently made an announcement about its sampling program, which will end in Nov'2010. This ought to be a precursor to drilling, which will also test some geophysical targets. Obviously this offers the prospect of a huge discovery, however we will have to wait to see the size of the anomalies. The company might turn out a dud, or possess a company-making mine. This company is one of the cheapest entries into Africa at the moment, so we will retain our stake and buy more on weakness.
3. MIL Resources (MGK.ASX) is under selling pressure. We so no upside in this stock because of the lack of infrastructure in PNG. This might be resolved in 5-7 years time, as I see Origin is preparing a feasibility study for the development of a 1200MW power station. In the meantime they have some exciting gold projects, but they are not very advanced, and exploring in PNG is considerably more expensive, so we opted to pursue more immediate targets.
4. Azure Minerals (ASZ.ASX): I originally bought this stock at 4.4c, and I sold prematurely at 5.3c, as I was trying to trade, knowing they would go higher. They reached 6.5c, but I eventually got in again at 6.7c, and today sold at 7c, before buying back in again at 6.7c. Now 7c. Again, the moving average is crossing over, and I expect this stock to move higher. They are one of the highest grade copper stocks around, with this quarter expected to greatly expand their resource.
5. Marengo Mining (MGO.ASX): They are developing a very large copper-gold resource in PNG. Having just raised $Can20mil, the company is in the process of advancing its feasibility study. This stock has a lot of appeal for major fund managers, and the reason is, it will be targeted by a number of medium sized-large companies looking for a new target. Indophil Resources and Lihir Gold come to find, but maybe also Xstrata-size companies. I sold some stock this morning for 13.5c, and just bought back more at 12.5c this afternoon. Now 13c.
6. Gippsland Minerals (GIP.ASX): I have not traded this stock because of the low liquidity, its been very hard to get stock. Anyway, its hard to see their Egyptian project going ahead when there is no certainty of Rwandan-Congo tantalum-tin flooding the market. Anyway, there are better offerings. It does have gold-copper exposure, which needs a 2nd look by me.
7. There are some other base metal stocks around which I like, but with growing nventories for these metals, I will simply watch them.
8. For those of you with stakes in the stocks I recommended some time ago - like Perseus Mining (PRU.ASX) - recommended at 60c, now $3.01; Ampella Mining (AMX.ASX), then 60c, now $2.51; Gryphon Minerals (GRY.ASX) at 12c, now $1.30. Of course its not all good news. I stuffed up on AAM, though part of that was trying to trade my way out of quicksand. And of course I reversed out of MIL Resources (MGK.ASX) after spending 3 weeks researching the titanomagnetite market....and thought better of my early excitement.
If you go back far enough...you will find I stuffed up on AAM before, Gleneagle Gold and Matrix Metals. The problem with some of these companies is that they are too good to be true, which is why I end up buying them. I sadly have no industry contacts, so I get stung by these cheap stocks which people in the industry know about. Oh well. Despite ineffective regulation by ASIC, I can still make money. Their regulation of small stocks comprises asking CEOs why their stocks have increased 50% in the last 5 days and reporting their explanations. Pretty poor! Useless government. Yep, both factions of that government monopoly. don't kid yourself..there is no competition. Tyranny of democracy.
-----------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Marengo Mining (ASX:MGO) - target 20c

Marengo Mining (ASX:MGO) is up still more today to 14.5c. We bought this stock just a week ago for 9.4c. The target price is 20c - since that is significant resistance. This stock has a major long life copper-gold project. Looking at the sections in the presentation shows that certain parts are amenable to cheap mining, i.e. low overburden removal costs. This is the case because one area hosts the mineralisation in a mountain. Easy mining and adequate grades means this project will be a great target for a major miner. The project will offer huge cashflows for the first 20 years of its life. Its hard to see the economics of the project beyond that point until I see more sections of the orebody, but there is no reason to think it would be less profitable, even if overburden rates increase.
---------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Marengo Mining (ASX:MGO) - major copper project

Marengo Mining (ASX:MGO) is another stock which might find some upside in the current market. This is a copper-gold project in PNG. They have a resource of 1.5 billion tonnes of 0.5% Copper equivalent. They have the opportunity to mine the side of a mountain for early cashflow, and tailings can be pumped as a slurry to the sea. This is going to be a monumental mine. See Google Finance. The company recently raised $C20mil to deliver a Canadian listing, and the company is expecting to complete the Final Feasibility Study by the year end. I would not be surprised to see some delays due to a need for more drilling.
At a time that copper prices are very high, this is a very attractive entry for a major mining house like Xstrata. This is a large, long life mining project, and the presence of a number of investment funds on the register highlights the strategic investment interest in this company. Among the investors are Sentinel Fund and George Soros Investment Fund.
--------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Tuesday, September 07, 2010

Azure Minerals (AZS.ASX) - break out!

Hi all, Azure Minerals (AZS.ASX) has broken out of its 'channel', breaking 4.5c, and is now trading at 4.6c. This stock is set to release a feasibility study and more drill results this half-year. We also expect a much expanded resource which will greatly add to the Net Present Value of the stock. We can also expect that drilling from a number of its other projects, where OZ minerals and JOGMEC, a Japanese state enterprise are earning interests.
The company is a good exposure to copper, silver and gold....all of which have handsome prices at the moment. The other alluring feature of this company is the high grade of the copper. I think its 5%Cu, compared to the usual grades of 1-1.5%Cu, and the resource is open, so great upside in NPV.
-------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Sunday, September 05, 2010

Vital Metals (VML:ASX) - last remaining gold in Africa

If you happen to be watching my blog at the moment...I was going to buy these this morning at 8.8c, but missed out, so ended up buying some at 9.2c. See Google Finance.

1. Vital Metals (VML:ASX): The company is exploring a tungsten skarn in Qld (Watershed) and Burkina Faso (gold) in Africa. Scope for 50% increase.

a. Capital: The company has 186mil shares at 8.8c worth $16mil. Cash $1.5mil. They don’t have enough cash, though they look like they are about to recover.

b. Reports: see presentations and Google Finance.

c. Burkina Faso: Apparently there is an underutilised plant 45km to east. Their areas lie at the juncture of two crustal faults. See report. One of the cheapest remaining exposures to African gold. They have a good tenement position.

-------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Thursday, September 02, 2010

MIL Resources (MGK.ASX) - downgraded

Over the last few weeks I have been studying the iron ore and steel markets in order to develop a better understanding of the value of MIL Resources. When I first bought this stock I was fired up because of the strategic value of their iron ore resource, and the long term potential of their gold projects. Drilling results from the Poi prospect are encouraging, however they do not motivate me to buy now. More likely they will be better buying in a few months. In the short term however, all I can see is the spectre of:
1. Amazon Bay going nowhere. A great resource but I question whether Chinese enterprises will be interested in developing it because of labour issues and infrastructure challenges in PNG. Most particularly lack of roads, power, and maybe coal/gas, but coal could come from Australia (Gladstone). I have metallurgical concerns. I hope they look for a better process, because I think there is no mature technology to compete with HIsmelt, and I think there is so far inadequate demand for high-alloy, high strength steel. That will come, but it might be 10-15 years. I think in the short term, a lot of money could be lost developing that project. It was my reason for buying now, so that reason has evaporated. Chinese steelmakers are going to be focusing on converting their blast furnaces to HIsmelt route, as well as developing competing coal resources in China, Mongolia, Russia and Canada. Both options are cheaper options in the short term. Interest in Amazon Bay might however come from the Japanese or India, as they have more interest in specialty steels. Is there the market incentives? Hmmm?
2. Gold projects: MIL has a number of gold projects which look really good. The Poi project is revealing its potential. The problem I have is the amount of money which will need to be sunk into these projects. I've seen it all before with PNG projects. All the road, drilling pad, line clearing, helicopter support, etc. Its an expensive exploration exercise which has driven many companies into administration or a similar fate. City Resources in the 1980s comes to mind. They might be able to farm-out some of these costs, but I will wait and see.
3. Dilution: MIL Resources is planning to consolidate its ownership over the projects it holds through Titan Metals. This is unfortunately dilutionary, and it will not be long before they will need more cash given the expensive exploration budget.
Really like the potential upside in this stock, but without a self-funded Amazon Bay project, I am easily scared off this stock. I will retain some stock because if a HK billionaire can make a bid for NZ Steel and get rejected by NZ Investment Review Board, there just might be some Chinese 'long term' capital for Amazon Bay. I just don't see the strategic sense. Also there may be some excitement from Poi and the other gold deposits. i.e. Some fantastic drilling results.
----------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Azure Minerals (AZS.ASX) - good entry

I have over the last year drawn your attention to Azure Minerals as an emerging stock worthy of consideration. I now believe it is the time to buy this stock, so I have bought a number over the last few days. There are a number of appealing features:
1. A number of good projects - one proven commercial project with upside and several other projects with partners earning in, saving the company money
2. Cashed up - The company had a capital raising in May, so it has $5.6mil in cash
3. Drilling - The company is about to drill a number of projects, with the Promentorio offering the prospect of a substantial increase in resources, which would greatly expand the in-situ wealth of the company.
4. Share price - The company is languishing at a record low, it has consolidated, so I believe its likely to attract a re-rating soon because of its advanced project, cash and drilling activity.
5. Commodity mix - The company is chasing the right commodities....mostly copper, but also silver and gold, and the prices for these are high, and likely to remain so. Copper stockpiles are falling, and gold/silver are even better looking.

The company is developing a number of projects:
1. Promentorio is 100% owned, its a high grade copper, gold & silver deposit. They are preparing a feasibility study on this project. Reserves of 502,000 tonnes @ 4.7%Cu (23,400tCu), 2.1g/t Au (34,000oz Au) and 99g/t Ag (1,600,000oz Ag). All these metals are very appealing because they are high. NPV of $60mil, but could be increased by 2-4x by further drilling in 2010/11. Low capex. They have tested only 250m strike (of 1km+ structure) and 150m depth. So strike & depth potential. They will also test a nearby ‘blind’ porphyry copper target.
2. La Tortuga JV with JOGMEC, a Japanese govt agency. They are spending $3mil for 50% stake, already spent $1.2mil. This is a porphyry copper target. Drilling this Sept quarter. Previous drilling intersected 159.6m@0.2%Cu,0.2%Zn from surface, with the bottom 26.9m returning 0.5% copper, 0.4% zinc & 12g/t silver.
3. San Eduardo JV with OZ Minerals, spending $US13mil for 70% interest on a porphyry copper deposit. IP surveys and drilling in the 2nd half of 2010.
4. Estacion Llano project is along strike from the Timmins Gold San Francisco mine (1.3Moz). Mineralisation may extend into its area, so potential for a sale of its project area to the 100,000oz/yr miner if they strike attractive mineralisation.
5. Other project interests as well.
The company has 355mil shares on issue at 4.1c worth $14.6mil. They have cash reserves of $5.4mil after an 100mil issue at 5c in May 2010. They are considering a Toronto listing which promises further upside, but they don't need the cash for now.
See presentation at their website (May 2010). View the company's stock chart at Google Finance.
--------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Wednesday, September 01, 2010

Union Resources (UCL.ASX) - finding some support

I was able to sell 50% of my UCL two weeks ago at 1-1.2c, and topped back up at 0.8c. I was hoping to buy some more actually, but I found another great stock, so I will tell you about that one after I get some. I think UCL has a great deal of upside. There are several things which could happen:
1. Minemakers makes a takeover for Union Resources
2. Simultaneously someone makes a takeover for Minemakers to secure 90% of the Namibian phosphate project

BHP's tilt at Potash Corp and Vale S.A.'s acquisition of potash assets in Brazil highlights some interest by the majors in fertilisers. Understandably, they see an opportunity to consolidate their market power in this industry. Look at the dynamics:
1. Morocco currently produces 80% of global seaborne phosphate trade.
2. Union/Minemakers project has the potential to be the 2nd lowest cost producers after the Moroccans.

Personally, I agree with Mathew Kidd at Wilson Asset Management (WAM), that BHP should just buy-back shares. These companies have reached a size where there is simply no upside, or no capacity to get ahead of the market. Don't you buy stocks to out-perform the market? So where is the ability to do that if you have acquired the market. Even the ability to extort some market price advantage is lost on the fact that you are so big that any market you buy into fails to deliver much upside. You are better off just buying back your own stock...at least for the sake of the market. I think these CEOs are in such a 'pattern of behaviour' they fail to realise this.
---------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

Platinum Australia (PLA.ASX) - wait and see

Platinum Australia was up 4% yesterday. Despite the fact that the company is ramping up production, I think the stock is overpriced, as it has a considerable amount of capital expenditure to absorb as it develops other projects. There is also the spectre of labour/union conflicts, and I suspect we will see some softening in platinoid metal prices in the second half of this year. I anticipate a weaker stock price for this quarter, which will probably see the stock price fall to the 42c support. This will give the stock the upside I need to see before I enter this one, given the operational, labour and platinum price risks. Another problem might be the exchange rate, but I did not look into that. The feasibility study was based on a rate of 10rand = USD. The rate is now R7.4. This is the problem with South Africa particularly. Its such a strong commodity producer that commercial feasibility can be undermined by a strong Rand. Its a currency play more than anything else. Platinum resource definition looks simple....the problem is dodging the labour disputes and forex implications. Better to become a forex trader! The good news is that the currency has stabilised around R7.4.
For more details on PLA - see this presentation. Interestingly the presentation does not even show the currency...but then I guess no mining company does, despite its significant impact on earnings.
---------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com

MIL Resources (MGK.ASX) - gold project looking good

This is an update on some previous ongoing research I have been doing on MIL Resources (MGK.ASX). I hope to get to the shareholders meeting this month, but its probably not going to happen because of the preliminary work. The company is based in my hometown. A number of points to make. Firstly, I over-estimated the potential of the Amazon Bay titanomagnetite deposit. The deposit is a world-class strategic asset. The problem as I see it is that the 'mooted' 17Mtpa market for titanomagnetite is a mirage. It will not be developed unless someone is prepared to look at downstream steel production. It took me two weeks of researching steel to research that conclusion. i.e. Pig iron, titanium slag and vanadium metal. There is a similar operation in NZ which made a profit of $15mil last year. Bluescope is trying to sell the operation. This project is better located, has higher titanium, but it cannot compete with:
1. Titanomagnetite from China - there are actually some iron ore producers which supply titanomagnetite ore to steel makers in China, but they are mining the stuff for $12/tonne, so PNG cannot compete with that.
2. Titanomagnetite from Russia's Far East is mined for $5/tonne, and can be cheaply exported to NE China, so that is an appealing source for that part of China.
For these reasons I ignore the 17Mtpa of 'potential market' as ludicrous. Just because a steelmaker consumes titanomagnetite does not mean they are going to buy your product, least of all when the steelmaker owns the titanomagnetite mines. See a company called China VTM. For this reason, I have no confidence in the CRU 'strategic' report.
China is mostly based on blast furnace technology, which cannot accept high-Ti ores. Until that changes or demand for high-strength steels increases, this project does not have a market. If you want evidence of that, look at prices for vanadium. The market is over-supplied because of Chinese titanomagnetite production. So unless some Chinese or Indian company is willing to
enter this market, or even a technologically sophisticated Japanese or Korean company wanting to develop an offshore market in high-strength, specialty steels, then I think this project will retain that status for some time. I therefore think they are looking at the wrong market for partners. It is not China, who are
really a competitor, but Japan or maybe POSCO (Korea). Personally, if I was CEO, I'd be brushing up on my Japanese..
CEO: Sumimasen..Anata wa PNG ni ita kota ga arimasuka?
Japanese CEO: Eii
CEO: Hunto ni. Sagoi ei na! (Incredible!)
Japanese CEO: Biru onagaishimasu! (More beer please!)

It so happens that maybe the MIL Resources know all this because in recent times they have shifted focus to gold. And preliminary results from the Poi gold project, very close to Amazon Bay, are very good. The sampling has only just started, but the results are living up to my expectations. A single channel/trench in this interim report suggests the deposit is offering commercial grades. One section however does not make a mine; particularly not a trench sample, which provides only a single cutting of the mineralisation, and provides no indication of what is at depth, nor what is along the 11km strike.

I still think the company looks like good value, but the development lead time has been severely stretched for Amazon Bay, whether for product market potential, or because of the downstream investment required to create marketable product. Will a company want to do that in PNG? Well maybe not, but there is the potential to make the downstream elements near Gladestone, Qld for coal supplies. I would not be surprised to see an Electric Arc Furnace in Gladstone in future, both for the coal, coal seam gas, and port facilities.
The company has excellent potential with the gold projects, $2.8mil in cash, and a proven world class resource. In the short term, expect some more exciting trenching & drilling results. I am particularly pleased with the results from the first trench - yielding 12m @ 9.6g/t Au and 0.65% Cu - because of:
1. The high grade of the gold
2. The association with good copper grades
3. The fact that they have anomalous gold over 11km in streams, and they have only just started testing this structure.
There is also the potential for them to secure JV partners to explore some of their other gold projects. This deposit reminds me a little of the Highlands Pacific gold mine. I seem to remember Pat Elliott (chairman of MIL) from somewhere. I think he was chairman of Highlands, so its interesting that he ended up driving this project. I hope he does not enter into another stupid hedging arrangement, which drove HIG into the ditch. I would need to check that. Anyway, he can't do much damage as chairman or whilst they are explorers. That is what I love about exploration. They are so cheap. You simply can't destroy what you know is a great project until you start building a mine. By them I've usually sold and moved on. Not going to make the mistake of investing in real mines again. They are accidents waiting to happen.
The best investment is a company with $2-5mil in cash, a world class asset and a market capitalisation of $5-10mil. You would be surprised how many stocks are around like that. Gippsland Ltd is another one that comes to mind, Union Resources another. They make great takeover targets, they have no problem raising cash....ok...GIP is having some difficulty....but probably not for much longer.
---------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com