3. The porphyry copper - volcanic intrusive potential
Notwithstanding the potential of the Siana pit and depths with its historic production of 5 grams/tonne, I was more interested in the bulk tonnage, low grade porphyry deposit at the time. Why? Because there was a similar structure up the road that hosts a multi-billion dollar mine deposit. As far as I was concerned, everything hinged on the first deep drill hole. The results were sold as a 'plus' but 500m of 0.2g/t is not commercial. The distribution of the gold suggests you would have to go very deep to find commercial gold, and that becomes costly. There is still however the prospect of remobilised gold along faults (like Siana), but as far as I am concerned the porphyry potential has been disproven. Well it was a punt worth taking. The stock at the time rose from 5c (from where I started accumulating) to 25c.
For the last few years efforts have focused on defining a 2Moz gold resource at Siana. They have identified a 3 year open-pit deposit, plus a 7yr underrground mine. This has taken some time because they have had trouble getting mining consultants to complete work. But here we are at feasibility study time. The next stages are:
1. Capital raising - Red will requiring $60mil up front for the plant & open-pit, followed by another $8mil in 2 years (which could come from earnings) for the development of the UG. Of the $60mil, they appear to be modelling $25mil of equity, plus $35mil of debt. I suspect this project is robust enough to secure a debenture issue, though maybe underwriters were worried by the way Lafayette Mining was treated by the Philippines government after a mine spill. So we might expect a placement to institutions and Anglogold (13% shareholder) plus an entitlement for other shareholders (say 1:5 issue), with maybe Anglogold & a broker underwriting the shortfall. Thats a positive outcome because Anglogold will have a vested interest in guaranteeing project revenues (as a shareholder), which means no hedging will be required. Many good projects hav been ruined by hedging. We dont want it because we want the upside exposure to a higher gold price. Altrnatively Anglogold could just buy a stake. That would suit Red shareholders. Anglogold's intent I suggest is to ensure it retains ownership of the processing plant after Red's reserves are depleted, as it can use any surplus ore processing capacity for its much larger, longer life mine, as well as grabbing equity in Red's prospective tenure.
2. Plant construction, tailings dam construction, pre-strip - this will take about a year
3. Operation: So we are looking at the commencement of mining in early 2009.
I have prepared a financial model for the project based on the limited data available. I have used my forward estimates for the gold price, which are bullish by others standards, but I think they will be revising their numbers up as inflation picks up. I have factored in a very strong $A ($US1.25 in 2013) because of $US weakness, and expected tight commodity supplies. I have not allowed for any increase in underground resources, or Mapawa pit contributing in later years. The area has excellent potential for further discoveries, and since Anglogold is about to embark on an exploration program in Red areas, we might have exploration upside in 6-8mths. The UG I believe has the potential to be substantive resource too. So its a pretty conservative model....but the intent is to be realistic. Actually I think gold will perform much better.
I have prepared a financial model for the project based on the limited data available. I have used my forward estimates for the gold price, which are bullish by others standards, but I think they will be revising their numbers up as inflation picks up. I have factored in a very strong $A ($US1.25 in 2013) because of $US weakness, and expected tight commodity supplies. I have not allowed for any increase in underground resources, or Mapawa pit contributing in later years. The area has excellent potential for further discoveries, and since Anglogold is about to embark on an exploration program in Red areas, we might have exploration upside in 6-8mths. The UG I believe has the potential to be substantive resource too. So its a pretty conservative model....but the intent is to be realistic. Actually I think gold will perform much better.
Based on these numbers I have Red showing very volatile earnings mostly because of its production profile and a rising gold price. My NPV places a value of around $150mil on the company's Siana project after accounting for the $8mil in Year 2. Red offers the following sensitivity analysis for gold price, but I suggest they are not factoring in a much stronger $A.
Now given that Red is now trading at 10.5c, we can expect the company to be attempting to keep the price there prior to announcing the raising of $25mil at I guess 10c per share (as I assumed above). This gives a NPV per share of 29c, but on a yield basis we might give them a value of 18c in 2009, 22c in 2010, and thereafter it really depends on exploration, the gold price and retained earnings. These numbers fit with the chart below. So post issue I can see Red rising to 17-19c level. They will be major resistance levels, and where I would be taking profits. That might not seem like much upside, but dont forget the exploration. This is an evolving story, and this financial model does not really assess the long term possibilities of this project.
- Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com